Q noticedEleven factual claims, three cited sources, and two possible context gaps.
Needs reviewOriginalSHA-256 recorded · untouchedEvidenceObserved and detected items separatedAuthorityNo governed state changed
Real assistance · visible authority
Q can do more.You still decide what counts.
Add anything. Quantaible may preserve, classify, compare, detect, interpret, and propose—but it cannot silently convert analysis into authority.
Governance begins at intake and continues through original preservation, evidence classification, user decisions, history, Findings, and Receipt release.
Access ≠ authorityDetection ≠ factInterpretation ≠ proofReadiness ≠ release
Universal Q intakeUploaded video · 14 minutes · original preserved
Local-firstAnalysis proposalQ identified claims, context gaps, and areas requiring review.No Source, claim, Finding, or Receipt has been approved
Inspect originalReview evidenceRevise proposalReject
Separate release boundaryThe user decides whether a Receipt is issued, exported, or shared.Not issued
The public governance promise
Every consequential transition remains visible.
Governance is not a final approval screen. It begins when material enters Q and continues through preservation, analysis, evidence, decisions, history, and release.
Permission begins at the doorway
Adding material does not create unlimited access.
Upload, Paste, Link, Record, and Ask each create a visible intake boundary. Quantaible works only with the material and permissions attached to that intake.BoundaryLocal access does not silently become remote-processing permission, permanent retention, or authority to inspect unrelated material.
The original remains distinct
Preserve what entered before creating derivatives.
The original file, text, URL, recording, or question remains separate from transcripts, extracted text, frames, summaries, annotations, and model-generated analysis.BoundaryA derivative may point back to the original. It may not silently replace it, rewrite it, or inherit stronger evidential authority.
Assistance remains visible
See what Q did, what it used, and what it could not establish.
Q may classify material, identify claims, surface contradictions, compare sources, propose routes, and explain why something deserves review.BoundaryA fluent answer, detector result, or high confidence score remains analysis—not an approved source, accepted claim, governed finding, or issued Receipt.
Evidence classes stay separate
Observation is not interpretation.
Quantaible distinguishes what is directly visible or audible, what a tool detected, what may explain it, and what remains unresolved.BoundaryThe system must not collapse behavioural cues, model output, uncertainty, or incomplete provenance into unsupported certainty.
Consequential changes remain attributable
Know what changed, who decided, and why.
Accepted, rejected, deferred, revised, and superseded decisions remain attached to the Investigation rather than disappearing behind the latest result.BoundaryNavigation, automation, collaboration, and convenience never remove the requirement for visible authority.
Release remains intentional
Readiness is not issuance.
Before a Receipt leaves the Investigation, Quantaible shows what will be included, excluded, redacted, contradicted, unresolved, and carried forward.BoundaryThe user or an explicitly authorised governor decides whether a Receipt is issued, exported, or shared.
Evidence before inference
What happened and what it might mean are different claims.
Quantaible keeps direct observation, tool output, possible explanation, and unresolved uncertainty visibly separate.
Observed
Directly visible, audible, measurable, or present in the supplied material.
ExampleAt 02:14.6, the speaker looked down, compressed their lips, and paused before answering.
Detected
Identified by a model, detector, measurement system, or comparison method.
ExampleA synchronisation model detected a possible audio-to-lip timing inconsistency in the selected interval.
Interpreted
A possible explanation that goes beyond what the material directly establishes.
ExampleThe pause may reflect hesitation, recall effort, uncertainty, interruption, or another cause.
Unresolved
Evidence is insufficient, conflicting, inaccessible, or too weak for a responsible conclusion.
ExampleThe source quality is insufficient to determine whether the audio was materially altered.
Behavioural and media analysis boundary
Visible behaviour is evidence. Internal state is interpretation.
Q may describe movement, timing, gaze, facial action, speech pauses, editing indicators, or synchronisation anomalies. It must not turn those observations into automatic claims of deception, guilt, diagnosis, identity, or protected attributes.
Non-negotiable boundaries
Some conclusions require more than a model output.
Advanced media, behavioural, medical, legal, financial, political, and identity-related analysis must remain constrained by evidence, consent, context, uncertainty, and human review.
No automatic deception score
Visible behaviour, hesitation, gaze, facial movement, or vocal change must not be converted into an unsupported claim that a person is lying.
No hidden-state certainty
Q must not present intention, emotion, guilt, personality, or internal mental state as a proven fact merely because behaviour was observed.
No diagnosis from content
Medical, mental-health, neurological, or other diagnoses must not be inferred from media or text without an appropriate evidential and professional basis.
No protected-attribute inference
The system must not infer race, ethnicity, religion, sexuality, disability, or other protected attributes from appearance, voice, behaviour, or context.
No identity matching by default
Facial recognition, permanent biometric profiles, and identity matching remain disabled unless a future use case has explicit, informed, lawful consent.
No missing-provenance shortcut
The absence of C2PA or another provenance credential is not proof that material is synthetic, altered, or deceptive.
No confidence-as-certainty
Model confidence, detector strength, repetition, popularity, and fluent language cannot substitute for transparent evidence and review.
No automatic release
A completed analysis or technically ready Receipt does not automatically become published, exported, or shared.
Visible review states
State communicates authority—not permanent truth.
A proposal can be available, under review, accepted, deferred, rejected, superseded, or ready for release. These states describe what happened and what still needs attention.
Later work may challenge or supersede an earlier decision. It must not silently erase the earlier path.
Not reviewedProposal availableNeeds reviewAcceptedDeferredRejectedSupersededReceipt readyReceipt issued
History remains inspectable
Rejection, deferral, exclusion, contradiction, uncertainty, permission decisions, and supersession remain part of the path rather than disappearing behind the latest answer.
Reviewable record
The result should travel with its limits.
Before a Receipt is issued, Quantaible shows what will be included, what remains private, and which contradictions, uncertainty, redactions, permission limits, and unresolved questions must travel with the result.
Included
Selected Sources, exact locations, governed Findings, and permitted review history.
Excluded
Private drafts, rejected suggestions, restricted material, and unrelated context.
Preserved
Contradictions, uncertainty, redactions, permission limits, and unresolved questions.
Receipt previewUploaded video investigation
Review in progress11Claims identified3Sources inspected2Context gaps1Conflict preserved
Original materialPreservedExact locationsAttachedEvidence classesSeparatedUncertaintyVisibleRelease previewNeeds reviewIssuance authorityUser only
Governance across every Workspace
The environment can change. Authority cannot silently expand.
Every Workspace uses the same real Q pipeline and visible authority boundary. Workspaces shape tools, defaults, layouts, depth, and collaboration without creating a separate or less-governed path.
Sources into durable writing
Writer Workspace
Organise quotations, notes, arguments, citations, continuity, and revision without allowing generated prose to outrank the preserved sources behind it.Explore Workspaces →Accountable investigation
Journalist Workspace
Track sources, interviews, timelines, public records, contradictions, claims, and publication evidence while preserving attribution and review history.Explore Workspaces →Reproducible inquiry
Research Workspace
Work across papers, datasets, methods, citations, competing interpretations, and unresolved questions without collapsing uncertainty into a final answer.Explore Workspaces →Evidence-backed decisions
Analyst Workspace
Structure comparisons, scenarios, risks, findings, and decision support while keeping assumptions, limitations, and authority boundaries visible.Explore Workspaces →Bounded media integrity
Media Investigation Workspace
Examine video, audio, images, transcripts, provenance, alteration indicators, and timelines without turning behavioural cues into unsupported certainty.Explore Workspaces →Shared work · visible authority
Collaborative Workspace
Add permissioned contribution, shared review, attribution, handoff, and collaborative outputs without dissolving individual ownership or governance.Explore Workspaces →User-shaped environment
Custom Workspace
Choose tools, capability modules, and layout while retaining the same permission, consent, provenance, governance, and Receipt boundaries.Explore Workspaces →Every individual Workspace
Quantaible Complete
Use every professional Workspace through one Q entrance and one governed foundation without purchasing stronger truth or authority.Explore Workspaces →See visible authority in practice
Add anything. Keep authority.
Enter the real Q pipeline, preserve the original, inspect what Q proposes, and decide what becomes governed, shared, or issued.